tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post8311868194547484630..comments2024-03-18T00:47:50.425-07:00Comments on The official Google Code blog: Google Analytics Launches Asynchronous TrackingMike Marchakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08067736591419106914noreply@blogger.comBlogger40125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-1409060060710880192012-02-27T16:57:39.899-08:002012-02-27T16:57:39.899-08:00I will use the code above and I hope it works well...I will use the code above and I hope it works well without a problem for my website analyticCopper Reflections Handmade Jewelryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16094541022136729930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-88092467669662409792010-11-20T08:31:23.324-08:002010-11-20T08:31:23.324-08:00It's amazing and nice step by Google to overco...It's amazing and nice step by Google to overcome the page speed problem.jaferihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04602834776567397401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-21435093241047464942010-09-07T23:53:25.844-07:002010-09-07T23:53:25.844-07:00Slight nit: async isn't exactly a new feature....Slight nit: async isn't exactly a new feature. Defer was in the 1998 HTML 4 standard and IE 4, and it is Mozilla who refused to implement it for a decade (because the execution order wasn't fully specified). So I think it's bizarre that Firefox is being praised for being the first to implement defer's new reincarnation.yonranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01991189606415753720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-92030894923516435392010-06-02T01:29:57.798-07:002010-06-02T01:29:57.798-07:00I am using google rollup account. Please let me kn...I am using google rollup account. Please let me know implementation procedure for Analytics asynchronus code. I have tried to make rollup but after editing in this code, Analytics is not showing any data.Deeliphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13143931865840037943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-46716097029008295042010-05-21T01:39:55.183-07:002010-05-21T01:39:55.183-07:00Implemented this 1 hour ago... now wait and see!Implemented this 1 hour ago... now wait and see!Pierrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14475602231117518009noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-4250924152036775002010-03-15T23:04:00.668-07:002010-03-15T23:04:00.668-07:00im a little confused... this page in the GA docume...im a little confused... this page in the GA documentation suggests that even though you can have multiple instances of the GA tracker on a page that they will read from the same cookies and clobber one another:<br /><br />http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/concepts/gaConceptsCookies.html#cookieImplementationLimits<br /><br />Does Asynchronous Tracking account for this and deal with it?cyclona23https://www.blogger.com/profile/02837510837489936030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-55400299005247271712010-02-23T14:27:53.972-08:002010-02-23T14:27:53.972-08:00I couldn't find any information on the "e...I couldn't find any information on the "exclude_me" cookie for excluding team members or anyone else you would want to exclude from google analytics. _gaq.push(['_setVar', 'exclude_me']); works as expected (where the synchronous code was pageTracker._setVar("exclude_me");) by setting an exclusion for a __utmv cookie.Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00824925262798597455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-25654576901709119962009-12-21T12:11:34.315-08:002009-12-21T12:11:34.315-08:00I just created a new Analytics account and it told...I just created a new Analytics account and it told me to use the old snippet, not the new one. Is that a bug or is the new snippet not ready for primetime?Bolinfeedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16203722926608871325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-79423567127802558542009-12-13T04:49:40.699-08:002009-12-13T04:49:40.699-08:00One thought - could Google please drop the "s...One thought - could Google please drop the "ssl" in the URL, and simply have https://google-analytics.com available?<br /><br />Since the URL spec calls for relative URLs to inherit any missing portions from the current address, the src for the script could then be just "//google-analytics.com/ga.js" with no script needed to correctly select http vs https.<br /><br />Not much of a saving, I know, but every little bit helps.Joel Finchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13233181006844405452noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-88685614667857524352009-12-09T17:34:50.520-08:002009-12-09T17:34:50.520-08:00@Francois & @Dan Russell, did you get anywhere...@Francois & @Dan Russell, did you get anywhere with figuring out whether the push trackPageview would work for tracking link clicks?Noodleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03517308903580463126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-35395678915420480822009-12-09T08:59:10.257-08:002009-12-09T08:59:10.257-08:00@Francois I came to ask the same thing. Looks lik...@Francois I came to ask the same thing. Looks like you've gotta change that or the code won't work anymore. The code you have there seems to work.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09362191564363045554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-72143303078157462442009-12-08T20:22:53.183-08:002009-12-08T20:22:53.183-08:00Blogger's comment system isn't great for a...Blogger's comment system isn't great for answering questions. If you ask your questions on the Help forum, I'll do my best to answer them. <br /><br />http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Analytics/label?lid=5a6c689030bdafe7&hl=enBrianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03516004238247475125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-53266889165019052102009-12-07T08:29:33.364-08:002009-12-07T08:29:33.364-08:00If I was using
pageTracker._trackPageview("/...If I was using<br /><br />pageTracker._trackPageview("/myurl.html");<br /><br />should I use <br /><br />_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/myurl.html']);<br /><br />or should I stay with the old code.Françoishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11389102246040033228noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-205179264676104182009-12-07T02:34:01.195-08:002009-12-07T02:34:01.195-08:00Will you add the async feature to Urchin?
Also, w...Will you add the async feature to Urchin?<br /><br />Also, we use 2 profiles for every call to GA (1 for local profile and 1 for global rollup profile). How would you setup the async calls in that situation?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06656712069255970828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-63932608216425437652009-12-05T04:03:53.737-08:002009-12-05T04:03:53.737-08:00Added this into a website today, seemed nice at fi...Added this into a website today, seemed nice at first, but was causing consistent problems with jquery / coda-slider v2 in google chrome resulting in problems with the first panel in coda. Took everything back to the old analytics code and it all works fine. In Firefox or IE7+ there were no such issues.The Guv'norhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14589852772550487843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-65154763317359803432009-12-04T15:07:09.168-08:002009-12-04T15:07:09.168-08:00On a website I've just changed over and the fo...On a website I've just changed over and the following are results from YSlow doing 10 page refreshes with Web Developer toolbar disabling Cache:<br /><br />Old GS Tracking code in Footer<br /><br />1) 1.614s<br />2) 1.418s<br />3) 1.573s<br />4) 1.343s<br />5) 1.304s<br />6) 1.373s<br />7) 1.529s<br />8) 1.429s<br />9) 3.4s<br />10) 1.781s<br /><br />New Async Tracking Code in Header<br /><br />1) 1.789s<br />2) 1.73s<br />3) 1.707s<br />4) 1.727s<br />5) 1.761s<br />6) 2.171s<br />7) 1.767s<br />8) 1.864s<br />9) 1.792s<br />10) 1.86sIntellixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10582350733267494680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-59879534343947442482009-12-03T02:15:41.281-08:002009-12-03T02:15:41.281-08:00Will you lose all your previously collected data w...Will you lose all your previously collected data when you start using the new code?KJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07932620557215466796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-16019882067445232492009-12-03T01:37:45.539-08:002009-12-03T01:37:45.539-08:00The comment above by "Super" is spam - i...The comment above by "Super" is spam - isn't there a way to report spam here?<br /><br />What about answers to the fixes shown here by other users? An official response would be helpful.colnectorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00454900325413396837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-40962444231940300072009-12-02T17:18:46.450-08:002009-12-02T17:18:46.450-08:00http://www.top-battery.com.au/
http://www.ibuynow....http://www.top-battery.com.au/<br />http://www.ibuynow.com.au/<br />We specialize in substitute laptop batteries (laptop battery) packs for, camcorders batteries, digital camera batteries, PDA batteries, mobile phones batteries, and power tools battery, etc. as well as battery chargers<br />Online shopping for laptop batteries, laptop AC/DC adapters, battery chargers, camcorder batteries, digital camera batteries, PDA batteries, power tool batteries, 2-way radio batteries, GPS batteries, MP3 player batteries, iPod batteries, DVD player batteries, game player batteries, ink cartridges, laser toner,universal battery and more.Superhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12713092375507231592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-78681366982674714672009-12-02T15:23:37.737-08:002009-12-02T15:23:37.737-08:00this is great news. if you could nudge your collea...this is great news. if you could nudge your colleagues on the Ad Manager team to do something similar it would be even better. thanks!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17453107620926884264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-42204624081817533602009-12-02T14:34:31.157-08:002009-12-02T14:34:31.157-08:00IT'S A GOOD EXPERIENCE.IT'S A GOOD EXPERIENCE.GLOSTANhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04360670658532081715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-57067674917240197492009-12-02T14:26:12.917-08:002009-12-02T14:26:12.917-08:00Good Update Like it..Good Update Like it..anilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00010209102376446587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-60144659851581034522009-12-02T11:25:00.666-08:002009-12-02T11:25:00.666-08:00http://yura.thinkweb2.com/jstests/document_head_te...http://yura.thinkweb2.com/jstests/document_head_test_by_Garrett.html<br /><br />Try that in certain browsers (like Chrome and Opera 10), and you'll see that in fact the comment node is the first node returned (which is of course invalid to nest a <script> element under). <br /><br />My feeling is the GA code is *NOT* safe as is. They should use a more robust option.getifyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01884519514982705317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-77560983306903912092009-12-02T10:12:05.888-08:002009-12-02T10:12:05.888-08:00@Hannibal:
document.documentElement.firstChild is ...@Hannibal:<br />document.documentElement.firstChild is also a Text node for me. So instead of:<br /><br />document.documentElement.firstChild.appendChild(ga);<br /><br />This works: <br /><br />document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(ga);<br /><br />Or document.head.appendChild(ga), but this isn't yet implemented in browsers; or document.querySelector('head').appendChild(ga), but alas again.Gastón Ruízhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16483081208558005397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11300808.post-2177682629880755212009-12-02T09:59:32.332-08:002009-12-02T09:59:32.332-08:003 cheers (and about time :))!3 cheers (and about time :))!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13573875424361765539noreply@blogger.com